Arc A730M vs GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.51
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGK208DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 May 2013 (12 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843072
Core clock speed902 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors915 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate28.86393.6
Floating-point processing power0.6927 TFLOPS12.6 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs32192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cache32 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.5-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 80 Watt

GT 630 Rev. 2 has 220% lower power consumption.

Arc A730M, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 and Arc A730M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Arc A730M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 66 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 115 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 or Arc A730M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.