Radeon 680M vs GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated507
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Power efficiencyno data14.05
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK208Rembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 May 2013 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed902 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors915 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate28.86105.6
Floating-point processing power0.6927 TFLOPS3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache32 KB256 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length115 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 May 2013 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 50 Watt

GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 has 100% lower power consumption.

Radeon 680M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 17 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1124 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 or Radeon 680M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.