Radeon 680M vs GeForce GT 645 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.69
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF114Rembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 April 2012 (13 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores288768
Core clock speed776 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)102 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate37.25105.6
Floating-point processing power0.894 TFLOPS3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs4848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache384 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed957 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth91.87 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMIPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 April 2012 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 102 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 10 years, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 104% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 645 OEM and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 645 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 645 OEM
GeForce GT 645 OEM
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 645 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1177 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 645 OEM or Radeon 680M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.