Radeon Graphics vs GeForce GT 630 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 630 OEM and Radeon Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 630 OEM
2012
1 GB DDR3, 50 Watt
1.60

Graphics outperforms 630 OEM by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1010976
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
Power efficiency2.479.47
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK107Renoir
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 April 2012 (14 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192448
Core clock speed875 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate14.0042.00
Floating-point processing power0.336 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs1628
L1 Cache16 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed891 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.51 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 1.84
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 233% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 OEM in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 30 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8544 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 630 OEM or Radeon Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.