GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs GT 625 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 625 OEM with GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GT 625 OEM
2013
1 GB DDR3, 29 Watt
1.05

1050 Ti Max-Q outperforms 625 OEM by a whopping 1110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1137429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.7813.02
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGF119GP107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2013 (12 years ago)3 January 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48768
Core clock speed874 MHz1152 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1417 MHz
Number of transistors292 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate6.99268.02
Floating-point processing power0.1678 TFLOPS2.177 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs848
L1 Cache64 KB288 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed825 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth13.2 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.16.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 625 OEM 1.05
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 12.71
+1110%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 625 OEM 439
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 5314
+1110%
Samples: 1970

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−1325%
57
+1325%
1440p2−3
−1350%
29
+1350%
4K1−2
−1800%
19
+1800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 57
+0%
57
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+0%
67
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 57
+0%
57
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45
+0%
45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+0%
25
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
+0%
36
+0%
Metro Exodus 5
+0%
5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 46
+0%
46
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GT 625 OEM and GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 1325% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 1350% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is 1800% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.05 12.71
Recency 18 February 2013 3 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 75 Watt

GT 625 OEM has 158.6% lower power consumption.

GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 1110.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 625 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 625 OEM is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM
GeForce GT 625 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 62 votes

Rate GeForce GT 625 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 113 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 625 OEM or GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.