Quadro T1200 Mobile vs GeForce GT 555M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 555M with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GT 555M
2011
3 GB DDR3\DDR5, 35 Watt
1.68

T1200 Mobile outperforms GT 555M by a whopping 1042% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking942297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.3574.31
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF106TU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date27 October 2011 (13 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresUp to 1441024
Core clock speedUp to 753 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed753 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate12.6091.20
Floating-point processing power0.3024 TFLOPS2.918 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs2464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3\DDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthUp to 192 bit/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1569 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 50.2 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 555M 1.68
T1200 Mobile 19.19
+1042%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 555M 1146
T1200 Mobile 14387
+1155%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 555M 5884
T1200 Mobile 44135
+650%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
−1005%
210−220
+1005%
Full HD25
−132%
58
+132%
1440p2−3
−1550%
33
+1550%
4K7−8
−1057%
81
+1057%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6400%
65
+6400%
Fortnite 6−7
−1533%
95−100
+1533%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−5000%
50−55
+5000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−580%
65−70
+580%
Valorant 35−40
−286%
130−140
+286%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−562%
220−230
+562%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Dota 2 18−20
−500%
114
+500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5800%
59
+5800%
Fortnite 6−7
−1533%
95−100
+1533%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−5000%
50−55
+5000%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−3450%
71
+3450%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1850%
35−40
+1850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−580%
65−70
+580%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1083%
71
+1083%
Valorant 35−40
−286%
130−140
+286%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1025%
90−95
+1025%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Dota 2 18−20
−463%
107
+463%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5500%
56
+5500%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−580%
65−70
+580%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−517%
37
+517%
Valorant 35−40
−1011%
400−450
+1011%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−1533%
95−100
+1533%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−1220%
130−140
+1220%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−991%
120−130
+991%
Valorant 10−11
−1650%
170−180
+1650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1950%
41
+1950%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1050%
45−50
+1050%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1300%
40−45
+1300%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−120%
30−35
+120%
Valorant 8−9
−1188%
100−110
+1188%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 2−3
−5350%
109
+5350%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how GT 555M and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 1005% faster in 900p
  • T1200 Mobile is 132% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 1550% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 1057% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 6400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is ahead in 37 tests (82%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (18%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.68 19.19
Recency 27 October 2011 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 1042.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 555M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 555M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M
GeForce GT 555M
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 193 votes

Rate GeForce GT 555M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 145 votes

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 555M or Quadro T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.