GeForce 8200M G vs GT 540M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 540M and GeForce 8200M G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 540M
2011
2 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
1.14
+613%

GT 540M outperforms 8200M G by a whopping 613% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10971466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.48no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameGF108MCP77MV MCP79MVL
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores968
Core clock speed672 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.75no data
Floating-point processing power0.258 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API10
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 540M 1.14
+613%
8200M G 0.16

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 540M 476
+632%
8200M G 65

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p16
+700%
2−3
−700%
Full HD20
+900%
2−3
−900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
God of War 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
God of War 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Valorant 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
God of War 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
God of War 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Valorant 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Valorant 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
God of War 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how GT 540M and 8200M G compete in popular games:

  • GT 540M is 700% faster in 900p
  • GT 540M is 900% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 540M is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 540M performs better in 24 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.14 0.16
Recency 5 January 2011 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm

GT 540M has a 612.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 540M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200M G in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 540M
GeForce GT 540M
NVIDIA GeForce 8200M G
GeForce 8200M G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 975 votes

Rate GeForce GT 540M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 38 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 540M or GeForce 8200M G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.