Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce GT 520M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 520M with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

GT 520M
2011
1 GB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.71

PRO V710 outperforms GT 520M by a whopping 4548% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1202182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency4.2114.85
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGF108Navi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2011 (14 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores483456
Core clock speed600 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors585 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate4.800432.0
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB28 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s504.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 520M 0.71
PRO V710 33.00
+4548%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 520M 284
PRO V710 13129
+4523%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p7
−4186%
300−350
+4186%
Full HD12
−4483%
550−600
+4483%
1200p7
−4186%
300−350
+4186%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
Valorant 27−30
−4383%
1300−1350
+4383%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−4400%
900−950
+4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dota 2 12−14
−4483%
550−600
+4483%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4400%
270−280
+4400%
Valorant 27−30
−4383%
1300−1350
+4383%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Dead Island 2 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Dota 2 12−14
−4483%
550−600
+4483%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−4275%
350−400
+4275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4400%
270−280
+4400%
Valorant 27−30
−4383%
1300−1350
+4383%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dead Island 2 3−4
−4233%
130−140
+4233%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−4275%
700−750
+4275%
Valorant 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%

This is how GT 520M and PRO V710 compete in popular games:

  • PRO V710 is 4186% faster in 900p
  • PRO V710 is 4483% faster in 1080p
  • PRO V710 is 4186% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 33.00
Recency 5 January 2011 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 158 Watt

GT 520M has 1216.7% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 4547.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 520M is a notebook card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GeForce GT 520M
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 447 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 520M or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.