Mobility Radeon HD 560v vs GeForce GT 445M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GT 445M
2010
3 GB GDDR5, 35 Watt
2.10
+163%

GeForce GT 445M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 560v by a whopping 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking8301106
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.17no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Terascale 1 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameN11E-GEM96
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 September 2010 (13 years ago)5 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$310 $56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144320
CUDA cores144no data
Core clock speed590 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate10.6 billion/sec17.60
Floating-point performance339.8 gflops352.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 445M and Mobility Radeon HD 560v compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2
Maximum RAM amount3 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth60.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 445M 2.10
+163%
ATI Mobility HD 560v 0.80

GeForce GT 445M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 560v by 163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 445M 5249
+113%
ATI Mobility HD 560v 2460

GeForce GT 445M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 560v by 113% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p19
+171%
7−8
−171%
Full HD32
+167%
12−14
−167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how GT 445M and ATI Mobility HD 560v compete in popular games:

  • GT 445M is 171% faster in 900p
  • GT 445M is 167% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 445M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 445M is ahead in 31 test (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.10 0.80
Recency 3 September 2010 5 May 2010
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce GT 445M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 560v in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
GeForce GT 445M
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 560v
Mobility Radeon HD 560v

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 445M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 560v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.