Radeon Vega 7 vs GeForce GT 440 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated530
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Power efficiencyno data11.56
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF106Cezanne
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144448
Core clock speed810 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate19.4453.20
Floating-point processing power0.4666 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs2428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth43.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2010 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

Vega 7 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 440 OEM and Radeon Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 440 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 OEM
GeForce GT 440 OEM
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 32 votes

Rate GeForce GT 440 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1954 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.