Mobility Radeon HD 550v vs GeForce GT 435M
Aggregated performance score
GeForce GT 435M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 550v by 81% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 957 | 1111 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 0.20 | no data |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Terascale 1 (2008−2010) |
GPU code name | N11P-GT | M96 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 3 September 2010 (13 years ago) | 5 May 2010 (13 years ago) |
Current price | $67 | $56 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 320 |
CUDA cores | 96 | no data |
Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 450 MHz |
Number of transistors | 585 million | 514 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 7.8 billion/sec | 14.40 |
Floating-point performance | 249.6 gflops | 288 gflops |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on GeForce GT 435M and Mobility Radeon HD 550v compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 19.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 API with Feature Level 12.1 | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
GeForce GT 435M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 550v by 81% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GeForce GT 435M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 550v by 75% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 19
+90%
| 10−12
−90%
|
Full HD | 24
+20%
| 20
−20%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+16.7%
|
6−7
−16.7%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
This is how GT 435M and ATI Mobility HD 550v compete in popular games:
- GT 435M is 90% faster than ATI Mobility HD 550v in 900p
- GT 435M is 20% faster than ATI Mobility HD 550v in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 435M is 100% faster than the ATI Mobility HD 550v.
All in all, in popular games:
- GT 435M is ahead in 18 tests (72%)
- there's a draw in 7 tests (28%)
Pros & Cons Summary
Performance score | 1.39 | 0.77 |
Recency | 3 September 2010 | 5 May 2010 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 10 Watt |
The GeForce GT 435M is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 550v in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.