Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB vs GeForce GT 430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 430 and Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 430
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 49 Watt
1.44

RX 9060 XT 8 GB outperforms GT 430 by a whopping 3279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking101168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0595.98
Power efficiency2.2424.69
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGF108Navi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)4 June 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 9060 XT 8 GB has 191860% better value for money than GT 430.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962048
CUDA cores per GPU96no data
Core clock speed700 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3130 MHz
Number of transistors585 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate11.20400.6
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs16128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 - 28.8 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 430 1.44
RX 9060 XT 8 GB 48.66
+3279%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 430 603
RX 9060 XT 8 GB 20390
+3281%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Fortnite 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−3275%
270−280
+3275%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
Valorant 30−35
−3135%
1100−1150
+3135%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−3181%
1050−1100
+3181%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Dota 2 18−20
−3233%
600−650
+3233%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Fortnite 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−3275%
270−280
+3275%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Valorant 30−35
−3135%
1100−1150
+3135%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Dota 2 18−20
−3233%
600−650
+3233%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3233%
100−105
+3233%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−3275%
270−280
+3275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%
Valorant 30−35
−3135%
1100−1150
+3135%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−3100%
160−170
+3100%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−3233%
300−310
+3233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−3233%
500−550
+3233%
Valorant 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−3233%
500−550
+3233%
Valorant 7−8
−3186%
230−240
+3186%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.44 48.66
Recency 11 October 2010 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 150 Watt

GT 430 has 206.1% lower power consumption.

RX 9060 XT 8 GB, on the other hand, has a 3279.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 430 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GeForce GT 430
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1205 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 74 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 430 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 8 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.