Quadro RTX 6000 Passive vs GeForce GT 425M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1095not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.98no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF108TU102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964608
Core clock speed560 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1620 MHz
Number of transistors585 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate8.960466.6
Floating-point processing power0.215 TFLOPS14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs16288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cache128 KB4.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s624.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 260 Watt

GT 425M has 1030.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 425M and Quadro RTX 6000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 425M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 6000 Passive is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 425M
GeForce GT 425M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 62 votes

Rate GeForce GT 425M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 9 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 425M or Quadro RTX 6000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.