Tesla C1080 vs GeForce GT 420M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1169not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.13no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGF108GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96240
Core clock speed500 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors585 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00048.80
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs1680
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 188 Watt

GT 420M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 717.4% lower power consumption.

Tesla C1080, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 420M and Tesla C1080. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 420M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C1080 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 420M
GeForce GT 420M
NVIDIA Tesla C1080
Tesla C1080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 134 votes

Rate GeForce GT 420M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tesla C1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 420M or Tesla C1080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.