ATI Radeon X1650 AGP vs GeForce GT 415M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1233not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.36no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGF108RV530
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)1 February 2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed500 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors585 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.0002.000
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2010 1 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm

GT 415M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 125% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 415M and Radeon X1650 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 415M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon X1650 AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
GeForce GT 415M
ATI Radeon X1650 AGP
Radeon X1650 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 415M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 415M or Radeon X1650 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.