Arctic Sound-M vs GeForce GT 415M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1228not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.35no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGF108Arctic Sound
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (15 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores488192
Core clock speed500 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors585 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000230.4
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8256
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s1.23 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 500 Watt

GT 415M has 4066.7% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 415M and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 415M is a notebook graphics card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
GeForce GT 415M
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 415M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 415M or Arctic Sound-M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.