GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs GT 335M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 335M and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 335M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 28 Watt
0.99

RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms GT 335M by a whopping 2292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1106237
Place by popularitynot in top-10045
Power efficiency2.4321.67
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGT215GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores722048
Core clock speed450 MHz712 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1057 MHz
Number of transistors727 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate10.8067.65
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS4.329 TFLOPS
Gigaflops233no data
ROPs840
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 335M 0.99
RTX 3050 Mobile 23.68
+2292%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 335M 382
RTX 3050 Mobile 9122
+2288%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 335M 3106
RTX 3050 Mobile 77234
+2387%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−481%
93
+481%
1440p2−3
−2400%
50
+2400%
4K1−2
−3200%
33
+3200%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3433%
106
+3433%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−940%
50−55
+940%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2667%
83
+2667%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1043%
80−85
+1043%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−940%
50−55
+940%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−746%
110−120
+746%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1657%
123
+1657%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−410%
50−55
+410%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−213%
100−105
+213%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−940%
50−55
+940%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1933%
61
+1933%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−5400%
55−60
+5400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−723%
107
+723%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−1414%
106
+1414%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−550%
65
+550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−122%
71
+122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hitman 3 7−8
−300%
27−30
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−1850%
78
+1850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 27−30
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−3275%
130−140
+3275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1200%
35−40
+1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 18−20
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 24
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 12−14
Far Cry 5 0−1 12−14
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75
+0%
75
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 62
+0%
62
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40
+0%
40
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 69
+0%
69
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
+0%
78
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hitman 3 34
+0%
34
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45
+0%
45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+0%
19
+0%

This is how GT 335M and RTX 3050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 481% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 2400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 Mobile is 3200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 6100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 43 tests (64%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (36%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.99 23.68
Recency 7 January 2010 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 75 Watt

GT 335M has 167.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2291.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 335M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
GeForce GT 335M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2
25 votes

Rate GeForce GT 335M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9
4619 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.