GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile vs GT 335M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GT 335M and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 3050 Mobile outperforms GT 335M by a whopping 2292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1106 | 237 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 45 |
Power efficiency | 2.43 | 21.67 |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
GPU code name | GT215 | GA107 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) | 11 May 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 72 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 712 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1057 MHz |
Number of transistors | 727 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 75 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 10.80 | 67.65 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.1555 TFLOPS | 4.329 TFLOPS |
Gigaflops | 233 | no data |
ROPs | 8 | 40 |
TMUs | 24 | 64 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 64 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz | 1500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Single Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
HDMI | + | - |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Power management | 8.0 | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | 8.6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Other tests
- Passmark
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 16
−481%
| 93
+481%
|
1440p | 2−3
−2400%
| 50
+2400%
|
4K | 1−2
−3200%
| 33
+3200%
|
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−3433%
|
106
+3433%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−940%
|
50−55
+940%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−1100%
|
45−50
+1100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2667%
|
83
+2667%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−5400%
|
55−60
+5400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 2−3
−3000%
|
60−65
+3000%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−840%
|
45−50
+840%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−746%
|
110−120
+746%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−6100%
|
60−65
+6100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−1043%
|
80−85
+1043%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−213%
|
100−105
+213%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−940%
|
50−55
+940%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−1100%
|
45−50
+1100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1933%
|
61
+1933%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−5400%
|
55−60
+5400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 2−3
−3000%
|
60−65
+3000%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−840%
|
45−50
+840%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−746%
|
110−120
+746%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−6100%
|
60−65
+6100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−1657%
|
123
+1657%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−410%
|
50−55
+410%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−213%
|
100−105
+213%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−940%
|
50−55
+940%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−1100%
|
45−50
+1100%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−1933%
|
61
+1933%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−5400%
|
55−60
+5400%
|
Hitman 3 | 5−6
−840%
|
45−50
+840%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 12−14
−723%
|
107
+723%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
−1414%
|
106
+1414%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−550%
|
65
+550%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−122%
|
71
+122%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−6100%
|
60−65
+6100%
|
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−3500%
|
35−40
+3500%
|
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2900%
|
30
+2900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
−300%
|
27−30
+300%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−1850%
|
78
+1850%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 27−30 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 4−5
−3275%
|
130−140
+3275%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−1200%
|
35−40
+1200%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 18−20 |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 24 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 12−14 |
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 12−14 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 75
+0%
|
75
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 62
+0%
|
62
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 53
+0%
|
53
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 69
+0%
|
69
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 78
+0%
|
78
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 34
+0%
|
34
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 44
+0%
|
44
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 45
+0%
|
45
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
This is how GT 335M and RTX 3050 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 3050 Mobile is 481% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3050 Mobile is 2400% faster in 1440p
- RTX 3050 Mobile is 3200% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3050 Mobile is 6100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 3050 Mobile is ahead in 43 tests (64%)
- there's a draw in 24 tests (36%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.99 | 23.68 |
Recency | 7 January 2010 | 11 May 2021 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 28 Watt | 75 Watt |
GT 335M has 167.9% lower power consumption.
RTX 3050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2291.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 335M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.