Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs GeForce GT 240M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 240M and Radeon RX 560X Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 240M
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.51

RX 560X Mobile outperforms GT 240M by a whopping 1847% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1268470
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.6911.64
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGT216Polaris 21
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)11 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481024
Core clock speed550 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1202 MHz
Number of transistors486 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate8.80081.60
Floating-point processing power0.1162 TFLOPS2.611 TFLOPS
Gigaflops174no data
ROPs816
TMUs1664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 600 (DDR2), Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1450 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s92.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIDisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMIVGANo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
Power management8.0no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 240M 0.51
RX 560X Mobile 9.93
+1847%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 240M 2372
RX 560X Mobile 19829
+736%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12
−183%
34
+183%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2200%
23
+2200%
God of War 5−6
−520%
31
+520%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1200%
52
+1200%
God of War 5−6
−420%
26
+420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−525%
50
+525%
Valorant 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−618%
122
+618%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1400%
15
+1400%
Dota 2 10−12
−545%
71
+545%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1125%
49
+1125%
God of War 5−6
−320%
21
+320%
Metro Exodus 0−1 20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−425%
42
+425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−620%
36
+620%
Valorant 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1200%
13
+1200%
Dota 2 10−12
−500%
66
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−850%
38
+850%
God of War 5−6
−20%
6
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−275%
30
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−340%
22
+340%
Valorant 27−30
−252%
95−100
+252%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−3750%
75−80
+3750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−920%
50−55
+920%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
Valorant 3−4
−1667%
50−55
+1667%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+0%
34
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
+0%
36
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 33
+0%
33
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
God of War 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
God of War 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how GT 240M and RX 560X Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RX 560X Mobile is 183% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 560X Mobile is 3750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 560X Mobile is ahead in 31 tests (48%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (52%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 9.93
Recency 15 June 2009 11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 65 Watt

GT 240M has 182.6% lower power consumption.

RX 560X Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1847.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 560X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 240M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M
GeForce GT 240M
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 112 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 439 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 240M or Radeon RX 560X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.