Quadro Plex 2100 D4 vs GeForce GT 240M LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG96CG92
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 January 2010 (15 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32128 ×4
Core clock speed600 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors314 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt640 Watt
Texture fill rate9.60032.00 ×4
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs816 ×4
TMUs1664 ×4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s51.2 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2010 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 640 Watt

GT 240M LE has an age advantage of 1 year, a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 2682.6% lower power consumption.

Plex 2100 D4, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 240M LE and Quadro Plex 2100 D4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 240M LE is a notebook graphics card while Quadro Plex 2100 D4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GeForce GT 240M LE
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 D4
Quadro Plex 2100 D4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro Plex 2100 D4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 240M LE or Quadro Plex 2100 D4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.