Tesla M2075 vs GeForce 6800 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1338not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.39no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNV45GF110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date8 June 2004 (21 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed350 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors222 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)67 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate5.60032.14
Floating-point processing powerno data1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs1656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz783 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s150.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2004 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 67 Watt 200 Watt

6800 GT has 198.5% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2075, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 6800 GT and Tesla M2075. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 6800 GT is a desktop graphics card while Tesla M2075 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT
GeForce 6800 GT
NVIDIA Tesla M2075
Tesla M2075

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 113 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Tesla M2075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 6800 GT or Tesla M2075, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.