UHD Graphics 605 vs GeForce GT 240

Place in performance ranking	988	1032
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	0.53
Architecture	GT2xx (2009−2012)	Gen. 9 Apollo Lake (2016−2017)
GPU code name	GT215	Gemini Lake
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	17 November 2009 (14 years ago)	11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$80	no data
Current price	$708 (8.9x MSRP)	$458

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 605 has 5200% better value for money than GT 240.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	18
CUDA cores	96	no data
Core clock speed	550 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	750 MHz
Number of transistors	727 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	69 Watt	5 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105C C	no data
Texture fill rate	17.60	14.40
Floating-point performance	257.28 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 240 and UHD Graphics 605 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4 / LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB or 1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	54.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DVIVGAHDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	3.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.103
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 240 1.32
+12.8%

UHD Graphics 605 1.17

GeForce GT 240 outperforms UHD Graphics 605 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 240 510
+12.6%

UHD Graphics 605 453

GeForce GT 240 outperforms UHD Graphics 605 by 13% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 240 5221
+141%

UHD Graphics 605 2162

GeForce GT 240 outperforms UHD Graphics 605 by 141% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 +7.7%	13 −7.7%
1440p	27−30 +12.5%	24 −12.5%
4K	16−18 +6.7%	15 −6.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5
+33.3%

3−4

−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +20%	5 −20%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +300%	1 −300%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3
+100%

1−2

−100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Metro Exodus	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
+50%

2−3

−50%

This is how GT 240 and UHD Graphics 605 compete in popular games:

GT 240 is 8% faster in 1080p
GT 240 is 13% faster in 1440p
GT 240 is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 240 is 300% faster than the UHD Graphics 605.

All in all, in popular games:

GT 240 is ahead in 16 tests (42%)
there's a draw in 22 tests (58%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.32	1.17
Recency	17 November 2009	11 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB or 1 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	40 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	69 Watt	5 Watt