Radeon RX 9070 XT vs GeForce GT 240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 240 and Radeon RX 9070 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 240
2009
512 MB or 1 GB GDDR5, 69 Watt
1.19

RX 9070 XT outperforms GT 240 by a whopping 5276% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107932
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0162.27
Power efficiency1.3116.04
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGT215Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 November 2009 (15 years ago)6 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 9070 XT has 622600% better value for money than GT 240.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964096
Core clock speed550 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2970 MHz
Number of transistors727 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt304 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105C Cno data
Texture fill rate17.60760.3
Floating-point processing power0.2573 TFLOPS48.66 TFLOPS
ROPs8128
TMUs32256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB or 1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGAHDMI1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.24.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 240 1.19
RX 9070 XT 63.98
+5276%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 240 500
RX 9070 XT 26810
+5262%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 240 5221
RX 9070 XT 145958
+2696%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−756%
214
+756%
1440p2−3
−6200%
126
+6200%
4K1−2
−7900%
80
+7900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.20
−14.3%
2.80
+14.3%
1440p40.00
−741%
4.75
+741%
4K80.00
−968%
7.49
+968%
  • RX 9070 XT has 14% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 9070 XT has 741% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 9070 XT has 968% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8000%
160−170
+8000%
God of War 5−6
−3400%
170−180
+3400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−17300%
170−180
+17300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8000%
160−170
+8000%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−14700%
296
+14700%
Fortnite 3−4
−9967%
300−350
+9967%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3543%
250−260
+3543%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 190−200
God of War 5−6
−3400%
170−180
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%
Valorant 30−35
−1038%
350−400
+1038%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−17300%
170−180
+17300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−893%
270−280
+893%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8000%
160−170
+8000%
Dota 2 16−18
−5213%
850−900
+5213%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−14150%
285
+14150%
Fortnite 3−4
−9967%
300−350
+9967%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3543%
250−260
+3543%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 190−200
God of War 5−6
−3400%
170−180
+3400%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 160−170
Metro Exodus 2−3
−8150%
160−170
+8150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−8183%
497
+8183%
Valorant 30−35
−1038%
350−400
+1038%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−17300%
170−180
+17300%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8000%
160−170
+8000%
Dota 2 16−18
−5213%
850−900
+5213%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−13400%
270
+13400%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3543%
250−260
+3543%
God of War 5−6
−3400%
170−180
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4500%
276
+4500%
Valorant 30−35
−1038%
350−400
+1038%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−9967%
300−350
+9967%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−6433%
190−200
+6433%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−7114%
500−550
+7114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1358%
170−180
+1358%
Valorant 3−4
−14833%
400−450
+14833%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 90−95
Far Cry 5 0−1 260
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 212

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−7450%
150−160
+7450%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−940%
150−160
+940%
Valorant 6−7
−5400%
300−350
+5400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dota 2 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%
God of War 0−1 70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
God of War 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
+0%
174
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 152
+0%
152
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

This is how GT 240 and RX 9070 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is 756% faster in 1080p
  • RX 9070 XT is 6200% faster in 1440p
  • RX 9070 XT is 7900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 9070 XT is 17300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 9070 XT is ahead in 40 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 63.98
Recency 17 November 2009 6 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB or 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 304 Watt

GT 240 has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 340.6% lower power consumption.

RX 9070 XT, on the other hand, has a 5276.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9070 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 240 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 240
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Radeon RX 9070 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 978 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2049 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9070 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 240 or Radeon RX 9070 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.