UHD Graphics 615 vs GeForce GT 230M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 230M and UHD Graphics 615, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 230M
2009
Up to 1 GB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.55

UHD Graphics 615 outperforms GT 230M by a whopping 253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1225907
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.689.08
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGT216Amber Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)7 November 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48192
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors486 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00021.60
Floating-point processing power0.1056 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS
Gigaflops158no data
ROPs83
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedUp to 600 (DDR2), Up to 800 (GDDR3), Up to 1066 (GDDR3) MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 (DDR2), 25 (DDR3)no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIHDAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 230M 0.55
UHD Graphics 615 1.94
+253%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 230M 215
UHD Graphics 615 764
+255%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 230M 2363
UHD Graphics 615 3813
+61.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−400%
10
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Valorant 27−30
−35.7%
35−40
+35.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−129%
35−40
+129%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 10−12
−18.2%
13
+18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Metro Exodus 0−1 1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Valorant 27−30
−35.7%
35−40
+35.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Dota 2 10−12
+0%
11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Valorant 27−30
−35.7%
35−40
+35.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 2−3
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GT 230M and UHD Graphics 615 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 615 is 400% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 615 is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 615 is ahead in 33 tests (62%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (38%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 1.94
Recency 15 June 2009 7 November 2018
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 615 has a 252.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 53.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 615 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 230M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
GeForce GT 230M
Intel UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics 615

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 37 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230M or UHD Graphics 615, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.