GeForce FX 5700 vs GT 230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 230 and GeForce FX 5700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 230
2009, $44
512 MB GDDR3, 75 Watt
0.77
+670%

GT 230 outperforms FX 5700 by a whopping 670% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12091513
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.790.31
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG94BNV36
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)23 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed650 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors505 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate15.601.700
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs244
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 230 0.77
+670%
FX 5700 0.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 230 323
+708%
Samples: 264
FX 5700 40
Samples: 24

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 0.10
Recency 12 October 2009 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 25 Watt

GT 230 has a 670% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5700, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 230 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5700 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230
GeForce GT 230
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
GeForce FX 5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 77 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230 or GeForce FX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.