UHD Graphics vs GeForce GT 220M

Place in the ranking	1328	614
Place by popularity	not in top-100	6
Power efficiency	1.54	38.48
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code name	G96C	Jasper Lake GT1
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 June 2009 (15 years ago)	11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	256
Core clock speed	500 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	750 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.000	12.00
Floating-point processing power	0.08 TFLOPS	0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

MXM-II

Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 220M 0.31

UHD Graphics 5.52
+1681%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 220M 121

UHD Graphics 2151
+1678%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%
Valorant	24−27 −1631%	450−500 +1631%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	12−14 −1669%	230−240 +1669%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Dota 2	10−11 −1600%	170−180 +1600%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Valorant	24−27 −1631%	450−500 +1631%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Dota 2	10−11 −1600%	170−180 +1600%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −1614%	120−130 +1614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1650%	70−75 +1650%
Valorant	24−27 −1631%	450−500 +1631%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−1650%

35−40
+1650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1633%	260−270 +1633%
Valorant	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −1650%	35−40 +1650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3

−1650%

35−40
+1650%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.31	5.52
Recency	15 June 2009	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	55 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	10 Watt

UHD Graphics has a 1680.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce GT 220M

UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX

Mobility FireGL 9000

Mobility Radeon HD 3670

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 96 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220M on a scale of 1 to 5:

3 7122 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 220M or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.