Radeon RX 6650M XT vs GeForce GT 220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
210 OEM 210 PCI 315 OEM 405 OEM 505 OEM GT 220 GT 415 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 220 with Radeon RX 6650M XT, including specs and performance data.

GT 220
2009, $80
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.53

6650M XT outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 7564% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 220 GT 220
RX 6650M XT RX 6650M XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1276113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.7026.09
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGT216Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2009 (16 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed625 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2416 MHz
Number of transistors486 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate10.00309.2
Floating-point processing power0.1306 TFLOPS9.896 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache64 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.3 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADVIHDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIF + HDAno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 220 0.53
RX 6650M XT 40.62
+7564%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 220 222
Samples: 2213
RX 6650M XT 17070
+7589%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−7519%
1600−1650
+7519%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.81no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3060%
150−160
+3060%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1888%
150−160
+1888%
Valorant 27−30
−774%
230−240
+774%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1535%
270−280
+1535%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
Dota 2 10−12
−1227%
140−150
+1227%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3060%
150−160
+3060%
Metro Exodus 0−1 95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1888%
150−160
+1888%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Valorant 27−30
−774%
230−240
+774%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
Dota 2 10−12
−1227%
140−150
+1227%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−3060%
150−160
+3060%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1888%
150−160
+1888%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Valorant 27−30
−774%
230−240
+774%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3433%
100−110
+3433%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−14350%
280−290
+14350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2817%
170−180
+2817%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3
−4800%
95−100
+4800%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−5850%
110−120
+5850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3900%
80−85
+3900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 110−120

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−550%
90−95
+550%
Valorant 3−4
−8233%
250−260
+8233%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2800%
55−60
+2800%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

This is how GT 220 and RX 6650M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT is 7519% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650M XT is 14350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M XT performs better in 28 tests (45%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (55%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.53 40.62
Recency 12 October 2009 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 120 Watt

GT 220 has 106.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M XT, on the other hand, has a 7564.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 220 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 6650M XT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220
AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 220 GeForce GT 220
vs
R5 230 Radeon R5 230
RX 6650M XT Radeon RX 6650M XT
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
vs
7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT
GT 220 GT 220
vs
GMA X4700MHD GMA X4700MHD
GT 220 GT 220
vs
Radeon 550 550
GT 220 GT 220
vs
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT
GT 220 GT 220
vs
Millennium G450 LP
GT 220 GT 220
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
GT 220 GT 220
vs
T500 Max-Q T500 Max-Q
GT 220 GT 220
vs
FX 5700 Engineering Sample FX 5700 Engineering Sample
Go 7900 GTX SLI Go 7900 GTX SLI
vs
R5 A330 R5 A330
Go 7900 GTX SLI Go 7900 GTX SLI
vs
GTX 965M 4 GB GTX 965M 4 GB
GT 420M GT 420M
vs
HD Graphics 510 HD Graphics 510

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 852 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 76 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 220 or Radeon RX 6650M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.