Radeon RX 5700 vs GeForce GT 220

Place in the ranking	1215	120
Place by popularity	not in top-100	74
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	46.36
Power efficiency	0.72	15.28
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GT216	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	12 October 2009 (14 years ago)	7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79.99	$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 220 and RX 5700 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	2304
CUDA cores	48	no data
Core clock speed	625 MHz	1465 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1725 MHz
Number of transistors	486 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	58 Watt	180 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	9.840	248.4
Floating-point processing power	0.1277 TFLOPS	7.949 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	64
TMUs	16	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	168 mm	268 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	790 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.3 GB/s	448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	VGADVIHDMI	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF + HDA	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	3.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 220 0.57

RX 5700 37.49
+6477%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 220 218

RX 5700 14458
+6532%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21 −457%	117 +457%
1440p	1−2 −7000%	71 +7000%
4K	0−1	43

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−2700%

84
+2700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1825%	77 +1825%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −3300%	102 +3300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2400%	75 +2400%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −9800%	99 +9800%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1420%	76 +1420%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2573%	294 +2573%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −2167%	130−140 +2167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −763%	259 +763%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −3150%	130 +3150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2967%	92 +2967%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2133%	67 +2133%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −8900%	90 +8900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1400%	75 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −2545%	291 +2545%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −2817%	175 +2817%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −680%	75−80 +680%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −710%	243 +710%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1400%	60 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −2167%	68 +2167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1833%	58 +1833%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1360%	73 +1360%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −982%	119 +982%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −2483%	155 +2483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −810%	91 +810%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −93.3%	58 +93.3%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−7200%

73
+7200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	51
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3500%	36 +3500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −5100%	52 +5100%
Hitman 3	6−7 −817%	55 +817%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −3000%	93 +3000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −24300%	244 +24300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−2233%

70
+2233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −3000%	31 +3000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	31

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1650%

35
+1650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	97 +0%	97 +0%
Battlefield 5	180 +0%	180 +0%
Far Cry 5	112 +0%	112 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	288 +0%	288 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	113 +0%	113 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80 +0%	80 +0%
Battlefield 5	145 +0%	145 +0%
Far Cry 5	90 +0%	90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	276 +0%	276 +0%
Metro Exodus	143 +0%	143 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	98 +0%	98 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	77 +0%	77 +0%
Far Cry 5	64 +0%	64 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	118 +0%	118 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

102

+0%

102

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5

102

+0%

102

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	53 +0%	53 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50 +0%	50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	267 +0%	267 +0%
Metro Exodus	94 +0%	94 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	108 +0%	108 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	53 +0%	53 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	39 +0%	39 +0%
Hitman 3	39 +0%	39 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	116 +0%	116 +0%
Metro Exodus	57 +0%	57 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	48 +0%	48 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	26 +0%	26 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	15 +0%	15 +0%
Far Cry 5	26 +0%	26 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	70 +0%	70 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	64 +0%	64 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	11 +0%	11 +0%

This is how GT 220 and RX 5700 compete in popular games:

RX 5700 is 457% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 is 7000% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 is 24300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 5700 is ahead in 35 tests (50%)
there's a draw in 35 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.57	37.49
Recency	12 October 2009	7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	58 Watt	180 Watt

GT 220 has 210.3% lower power consumption.

RX 5700, on the other hand, has a 6477.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.