GeForce RTX 3080 Ti vs GT 220

Place in performance ranking	1171	16
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	no data	17.73
Architecture	GT2xx (2009−2012)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GT216	Ampere GA102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	12 October 2009 (14 years ago)	24 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$79.99	$1,199
Current price	$121 (1.5x MSRP)	$1135 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 220 and RTX 3080 Ti have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	10240
CUDA cores	48	no data
Core clock speed	625 MHz	1370 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1667 MHz
Number of transistors	486 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	58 Watt	350 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	9.840	532.8
Floating-point performance	144 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	6.6" (16.8 cm)	285 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	790 MHz	19000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.3 GB/s	912.4 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	VGADVIHDMI	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF + HDA	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.6
OpenGL	3.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 220 0.55

RTX 3080 Ti 70.29
+12680%

RTX 3080 Ti outperforms GT 220 by 12680% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 220 214

RTX 3080 Ti 27211
+12615%

RTX 3080 Ti outperforms GT 220 by 12615% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21 −919%	214 +919%
1440p	1−2 −14300%	144 +14300%
4K	0−1	96

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−7200%

219
+7200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −2075%	170−180 +2075%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6033%	184 +6033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −5750%	110−120 +5750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −4017%	247 +4017%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −2075%	170−180 +2075%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −5233%	160 +5233%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −17100%	172 +17100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −2700%	56 +2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −3667%	226 +3667%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −12300%	372 +12300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4767%	146 +4767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −5933%	181 +5933%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −6300%	120−130 +6300%
Hitman 3	3−4 −6900%	210 +6900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1375%	110−120 +1375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −4000%	164 +4000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −9800%	99 +9800%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −17500%	176 +17500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −12900%	130−140 +12900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −7800%	75−80 +7800%
Hitman 3	1−2 −11900%	120 +11900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −1014%	75−80 +1014%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	3−4 −3533%	109 +3533%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −2060%	108 +2060%

This is how GT 220 and RTX 3080 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 3080 Ti is 919% faster than GT 220 in 1080p
RTX 3080 Ti is 14300% faster than GT 220 in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3080 Ti is 17500% faster than the GT 220.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 3080 Ti surpassed GT 220 in all 25 of our tests.

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	0.55	70.29
Recency	12 October 2009	24 September 2020
Cost	$79.99	$1199
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	58 Watt	350 Watt