GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs GT 220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 220 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 220
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.53

RTX 2070 Super outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 8079% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking125995
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data35.29
Power efficiency0.7015.36
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT216TU104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)9 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GT 220 and RTX 2070 Super have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482560
Core clock speed625 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors486 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt215 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate9.840283.2
Floating-point processing power0.1277 TFLOPS9.062 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADVIHDMI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIF + HDAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 220 0.53
RTX 2070 Super 43.35
+8079%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 220 222
RTX 2070 Super 18164
+8082%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−529%
132
+529%
1440p0−180
4K0−152

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.81
−0.8%
3.78
+0.8%
1440pno data6.24
4Kno data9.60
  • GT 220 and RTX 2070 Super have nearly equal cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9300%
94
+9300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8300%
84
+8300%
Far Cry 5 0−1 123
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4250%
174
+4250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2225%
186
+2225%
Valorant 27−30
−933%
279
+933%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1535%
270−280
+1535%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
Dota 2 10−12
−1145%
137
+1145%
Far Cry 5 0−1 117
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4200%
172
+4200%
Metro Exodus 0−1 90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1963%
165
+1963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3520%
181
+3520%
Valorant 27−30
−900%
270
+900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7200%
73
+7200%
Dota 2 10−12
−1073%
129
+1073%
Far Cry 5 0−1 110
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3725%
153
+3725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1825%
154
+1825%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1900%
100
+1900%
Valorant 27−30
−619%
194
+619%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−6100%
124
+6100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−15250%
300−350
+15250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2817%
170−180
+2817%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−6150%
125
+6150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−11600%
117
+11600%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−520%
93
+520%
Valorant 3−4
−8500%
258
+8500%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−3200%
66
+3200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−2800%
58
+2800%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 341
+0%
341
+0%
Sons of the Forest 113
+0%
113
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 316
+0%
316
+0%
Fortnite 218
+0%
218
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 150
+0%
150
+0%
Sons of the Forest 90
+0%
90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 194
+0%
194
+0%
Fortnite 193
+0%
193
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 133
+0%
133
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Sons of the Forest 86
+0%
86
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Sons of the Forest 83
+0%
83
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 168
+0%
168
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 95
+0%
95
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 263
+0%
263
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Sons of the Forest 65
+0%
65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+0%
68
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+0%
84
+0%
Sons of the Forest 38
+0%
38
+0%

This is how GT 220 and RTX 2070 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 529% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Super is 15250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is ahead in 27 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 43.35
Recency 12 October 2009 9 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 215 Watt

GT 220 has 270.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Super, on the other hand, has a 8079.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 845 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 5588 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 220 or GeForce RTX 2070 Super, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.