Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs GeForce GT 220
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GT 220 with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.
Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 2909% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1221 | 326 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 0.68 | no data |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Xe LPG (2023) |
GPU code name | GT216 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 12 October 2009 (15 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 7 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2200 MHz |
Number of transistors | 486 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 58 Watt | no data |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 9.840 | no data |
Floating-point processing power | 0.1277 TFLOPS | no data |
ROPs | 8 | no data |
TMUs | 16 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
Length | 168 mm | no data |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 1-slot | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | no data |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
Memory clock speed | 790 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 25.3 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | VGADVIHDMI | no data |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
HDMI | + | - |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF + HDA | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12_2 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 3.1 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | - |
CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 21
−61.9%
| 34
+61.9%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 3.81 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−900%
|
90
+900%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2900%
|
90−95
+2900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−544%
|
58
+544%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2900%
|
90−95
+2900%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−1083%
|
70−75
+1083%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−720%
|
40−45
+720%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−244%
|
31
+244%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2900%
|
90−95
+2900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−325%
|
34
+325%
|
Fortnite | 0−1 | 90−95 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−1083%
|
70−75
+1083%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1400%
|
120−130
+1400%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−720%
|
40−45
+720%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−940%
|
52
+940%
|
World of Tanks | 16−18
−1147%
|
210−220
+1147%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−2900%
|
270−280
+2900%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2900%
|
90−95
+2900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−338%
|
35
+338%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7
−1083%
|
70−75
+1083%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1400%
|
120−130
+1400%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−2900%
|
90−95
+2900%
|
World of Tanks | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2900%
|
90−95
+2900%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−1000%
|
40−45
+1000%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−500%
|
24−27
+500%
|
Valorant | 5−6
−2900%
|
150−160
+2900%
|
4K
High Preset
Dota 2 | 14−16
−2900%
|
450−500
+2900%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−93.3%
|
27−30
+93.3%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−93.3%
|
27−30
+93.3%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 16−18 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−2900%
|
60−65
+2900%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
−93.3%
|
27−30
+93.3%
|
Valorant | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 38
+0%
|
38
+0%
|
Fortnite | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Valorant | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 71
+0%
|
71
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Valorant | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 66
+0%
|
66
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Valorant | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
Fortnite | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
This is how GT 220 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:
- Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 62% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 1400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc 7-Cores iGPU is ahead in 19 tests (38%)
- there's a draw in 31 test (62%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.55 | 16.55 |
Recency | 12 October 2009 | 14 December 2023 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 5 nm |
Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 2909.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GT 220 is a desktop card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.