T600 vs GeForce GT 130M

Place in the ranking	1324	383
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.34	29.27
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G96C	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	8 January 2009 (17 years ago)	6 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	640
Core clock speed	600 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1335 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.600	53.40
Floating-point processing power	0.096 TFLOPS	1.709 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	144	no data
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	16	40
L1 Cache	no data	640 KB
L2 Cache	32 KB	1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
SLI options	2-way	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 (DDR2)/800 (GDDR3) MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	16 (DDR2)/25 (GDDR3)	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	Single Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVI	4x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.6
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 130M 0.40

T600 15.23
+3708%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 130M 169
Samples: 189

T600 6369
+3669%

Samples: 561

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 130M 1629

T600 344838
+21069%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −5300%	54 +5300%
1440p	0−1	23
4K	0−1	20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3100%	30−35 +3100%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3100%	30−35 +3100%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −1500%	60−65 +1500%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −714%	55−60 +714%
Valorant	24−27 −385%	120−130 +385%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	14−16 −1260%	200−210 +1260%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3100%	30−35 +3100%
Dota 2	10−11 −1110%	121 +1110%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −1500%	60−65 +1500%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
Metro Exodus	0−1	26
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −714%	55−60 +714%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −860%	48 +860%
Valorant	24−27 −385%	120−130 +385%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −3100%	30−35 +3100%
Dota 2	10−11 −1010%	111 +1010%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −1500%	60−65 +1500%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 −480%	27−30 +480%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −714%	55−60 +714%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −440%	27 +440%
Valorant	24−27 −385%	120−130 +385%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	1−2 −11300%	110−120 +11300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −3650%	150−160 +3650%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −3700%	35−40 +3700%
Hogwarts Legacy	0−1	16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −2200%	21−24 +2200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

0−1

35−40

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −78.6%	25 +78.6%
Valorant	2−3 −4200%	85−90 +4200%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

−1400%

14−16
+1400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

2−3

−650%

14−16
+650%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2

85−90

+0%

85−90

+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	46 +0%	46 +0%
Fortnite	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	42 +0%	42 +0%
Fortnite	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	59 +0%	59 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Far Cry 5	39 +0%	39 +0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

85−90

+0%

85−90

+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V	27 +0%	27 +0%
Metro Exodus	15 +0%	15 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Far Cry 5	26 +0%	26 +0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Metro Exodus	8 +0%	8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 +0%	16 +0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Dota 2	40 +0%	40 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

This is how GT 130M and T600 compete in popular games:

T600 is 5300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the T600 is 11300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T600 performs better in 31 tests (49%)
there's a draw in 32 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.40	15.23
Recency	8 January 2009	6 May 2021
Chip lithography	55 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	40 Watt

GT 130M has 73.9% lower power consumption.

T600, on the other hand, has a 3707.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 358.3% more advanced lithography process.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 130M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 130M is a notebook graphics card while T600 is a workstation one.