Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) vs GeForce GT 130M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	not rated	1073
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code name	N10P-GE1	Stoney Ridge
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	8 January 2009 (15 years ago)	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	192
CUDA cores	32	no data
Core clock speed	600 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	600 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.600	no data
Floating-point performance	0.096 gflops	no data
Gigaflops	144	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
SLI options	2-way	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR2, GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 (DDR2)/800 (GDDR3) MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	16 (DDR2)/25 (GDDR3)	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Single Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVI	no data
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model	4.0	no data
OpenGL	2.1	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	8 January 2009	1 June 2016
Chip lithography	55 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---