Radeon HD 6470M vs GeForce GT 1030

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 1030 with Radeon HD 6470M, including specs and performance data.

GT 1030
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
6.23
+993%

GT 1030 outperforms HD 6470M by a whopping 993% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5851217
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.310.01
Power efficiency14.58no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGP108Seymour
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $569.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GT 1030 has 23000% better value for money than HD 6470M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384160
Core clock speed1228 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,800 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate35.235.600
Floating-point processing power1.127 TFLOPS0.224 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 1030 6.23
+993%
HD 6470M 0.57

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 1030 2452
+985%
HD 6470M 226

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 1030 4728
+784%
HD 6470M 535

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 1030 20192
+1084%
HD 6470M 1706

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p100−110
+900%
10
−900%
Full HD25
+92.3%
13
−92.3%
1440p25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%
4K100−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.16
+1288%
43.85
−1288%
1440p3.16
+8919%
285.00
−8919%
4K7.90no data
  • GT 1030 has 1288% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GT 1030 has 8919% lower cost per frame in 1440p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+650%
2−3
−650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Battlefield 5 31
+1450%
2−3
−1450%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry 5 19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Fortnite 47
+1075%
4−5
−1075%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+575%
4−5
−575%
Forza Horizon 5 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 28
+300%
7−8
−300%
Valorant 152
+443%
27−30
−443%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Battlefield 5 26
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+482%
16−18
−482%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+250%
2−3
−250%
Dota 2 45−50
+308%
12−14
−308%
Far Cry 5 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Fortnite 36
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 24
+500%
4−5
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Metro Exodus 7 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24
+243%
7−8
−243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Valorant 123
+339%
27−30
−339%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Dota 2 45−50
+308%
12−14
−308%
Far Cry 5 15
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
Forza Horizon 4 16
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 5 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16
+129%
7−8
−129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+200%
4−5
−200%
Valorant 14
−100%
27−30
+100%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
+1150%
2−3
−1150%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+1133%
3−4
−1133%
Valorant 65−70
+1033%
6−7
−1033%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+1300%
1−2
−1300%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 12
−25%
14−16
+25%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Valorant 30−33
+900%
3−4
−900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 7 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

This is how GT 1030 and HD 6470M compete in popular games:

  • GT 1030 is 900% faster in 900p
  • GT 1030 is 92% faster in 1080p
  • GT 1030 is 1150% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GT 1030 is 2200% faster.
  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the HD 6470M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 1030 is ahead in 33 tests (94%)
  • HD 6470M is ahead in 2 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.23 0.57
Recency 17 May 2017 4 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm

GT 1030 has a 993% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 1030 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6470M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 1030 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6470M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030
AMD Radeon HD 6470M
Radeon HD 6470M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8110 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 143 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6470M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 1030 or Radeon HD 6470M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.