Tesla P4 vs GeForce G210M

Place in the ranking	1321	253
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.64	21.38
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GT218	GP104
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	15 June 2009 (15 years ago)	13 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	2560
Core clock speed	625 MHz	886 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1114 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.000	178.2
Floating-point processing power	0.048 TFLOPS	5.704 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	72	no data
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	8	160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	168 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 1 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 500 (DDR2), Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	192.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	4.1	6.4
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce G210M 0.29

Tesla P4 20.28
+6893%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce G210M 128

Tesla P4 9064
+6981%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−6775%

1100−1150
+6775%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −6400%	130−140 +6400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −6400%	65−70 +6400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −6400%	130−140 +6400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −6400%	65−70 +6400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −6567%	200−210 +6567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −6329%	450−500 +6329%
Valorant	24−27 −6823%	1800−1850 +6823%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart	2−3 −6400%	130−140 +6400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	14 −6686%	950−1000 +6686%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −6400%	65−70 +6400%
Dota 2	10−11 −6400%	650−700 +6400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −6567%	200−210 +6567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −6329%	450−500 +6329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −6650%	270−280 +6650%
Valorant	24−27 −6823%	1800−1850 +6823%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −6400%	65−70 +6400%
Dota 2	10−11 −6400%	650−700 +6400%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −6567%	200−210 +6567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −6329%	450−500 +6329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −6650%	270−280 +6650%
Valorant	24−27 −6823%	1800−1850 +6823%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

3−4
−6567%

200−210

+6567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −6400%	65−70 +6400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −6567%	1000−1050 +6567%
Valorant	2−3 −6400%	130−140 +6400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	1−2 −6400%	65−70 +6400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	2−3 −6400%	130−140 +6400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

2−3
−6400%

130−140

+6400%

This is how GeForce G210M and Tesla P4 compete in popular games:

Tesla P4 is 6775% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.29	20.28
Recency	15 June 2009	13 September 2016
Chip lithography	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	75 Watt

GeForce G210M has 435.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla P4, on the other hand, has a 6893.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla P4 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G210M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce G210M is a notebook card while Tesla P4 is a workstation one.