Tesla P4 vs GeForce G210M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G210M with Tesla P4, including specs and performance data.

GeForce G210M
2009
Up to 1 GB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.29

Tesla P4 outperforms G210M by a whopping 6893% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1321253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.6421.38
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGT218GP104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)13 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed625 MHz886 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1114 MHz
Number of transistors260 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate5.000178.2
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPS5.704 TFLOPS
Gigaflops72no data
ROPs464
TMUs8160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 500 (DDR2), Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGANo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce G210M 0.29
Tesla P4 20.28
+6893%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce G210M 128
Tesla P4 9064
+6981%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−6775%
1100−1150
+6775%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−6329%
450−500
+6329%
Valorant 24−27
−6823%
1800−1850
+6823%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14
−6686%
950−1000
+6686%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Dota 2 10−11
−6400%
650−700
+6400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−6329%
450−500
+6329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−6650%
270−280
+6650%
Valorant 24−27
−6823%
1800−1850
+6823%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Dota 2 10−11
−6400%
650−700
+6400%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−6329%
450−500
+6329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−6650%
270−280
+6650%
Valorant 24−27
−6823%
1800−1850
+6823%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−6567%
200−210
+6567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−6567%
1000−1050
+6567%
Valorant 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−6400%
130−140
+6400%

This is how GeForce G210M and Tesla P4 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla P4 is 6775% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 20.28
Recency 15 June 2009 13 September 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce G210M has 435.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla P4, on the other hand, has a 6893.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla P4 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G210M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce G210M is a notebook card while Tesla P4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G210M
GeForce G210M
NVIDIA Tesla P4
Tesla P4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 85 votes

Rate GeForce G210M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 81 vote

Rate Tesla P4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G210M or Tesla P4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.