ATI Radeon 9600 vs GeForce G210M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G210M with Radeon 9600, including specs and performance data.

GeForce G210M
2009
Up to 1 GB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.31
+288%

G210M outperforms 9600 by a whopping 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13771521
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.700.51
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGT218RV350
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 June 2009 (16 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed625 MHz324 MHz
Number of transistors260 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate5.0001.296
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops72no data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 500 (DDR2), Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz189 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s6.048 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce G210M 0.31
+288%
ATI 9600 0.08

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce G210M 129
+269%
Samples: 214
ATI 9600 35
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
+300%
4−5
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14
+367%
3−4
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Valorant 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

This is how GeForce G210M and ATI 9600 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce G210M is 300% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.08
Recency 15 June 2009 1 October 2003
Chip lithography 40 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 12 Watt

GeForce G210M has a 287.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9600, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce G210M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce G210M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 9600 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G210M
GeForce G210M
ATI Radeon 9600
Radeon 9600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 106 votes

Rate GeForce G210M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 142 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G210M or Radeon 9600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.