GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs G210M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G210M and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce G210M
2009
Up to 1 GB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.33

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms G210M by a whopping 5579% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1310300
Place by popularitynot in top-10017
Power efficiency1.6228.67
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGT218GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed625 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors260 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate5.00094.53
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
Gigaflops72no data
ROPs432
TMUs864
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 500 (DDR2), Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce G210M 0.33
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.74
+5579%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce G210M 1021
RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+4486%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce G210M 1805
RTX 2050 Mobile 58257
+3128%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−180%
42
+180%
1440p0−133
4K-0−125

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−300%
36
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1533%
49
+1533%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−233%
30
+233%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−600%
21
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1420%
76
+1420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1000%
40−45
+1000%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−200%
27
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−400%
15
+400%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1067%
70
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1160%
63
+1160%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2033%
120−130
+2033%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1000%
40−45
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
World of Tanks 14
−1493%
220−230
+1493%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−267%
30−35
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−333%
13
+333%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−967%
60−65
+967%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1020%
56
+1020%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2033%
120−130
+2033%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8300%
160−170
+8300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 16−18
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1125%
45−50
+1125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−550%
24−27
+550%
Valorant 4−5
−1100%
45−50
+1100%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Dota 2 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5500%
55−60
+5500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 18−20
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Dota 2 14−16
−127%
34
+127%
Valorant 0−1 21−24

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 87
+0%
87
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Fortnite 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 43
+0%
43
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+0%
37
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+0%
47
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how GeForce G210M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 180% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 8300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.33 18.74
Recency 15 June 2009 17 December 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 45 Watt

GeForce G210M has 221.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 5578.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G210M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G210M
GeForce G210M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 82 votes

Rate GeForce G210M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2374 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.