Radeon RX 7600M XT vs GeForce G102M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G102M and Radeon RX 7600M XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce G102M
2009
Up to 512 MB GDDR2, 14 Watt
0.43

RX 7600M XT outperforms G102M by a whopping 8009% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1251146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.1220.03
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC79Navi 33
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2009 (16 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed450 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2469 MHz
Number of transistors314 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600316.0
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
Gigaflops48no data
ROPs464
TMUs8128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 1.0no data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDSPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce G102M 0.43
RX 7600M XT 34.87
+8009%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce G102M 167
RX 7600M XT 13404
+7926%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−11700%
118
+11700%
1440p0−157
4K-0−133

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Elden Ring 135
+0%
135
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 255
+0%
255
+0%
Metro Exodus 109
+0%
109
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Elden Ring 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 208
+0%
208
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 132
+0%
132
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 73
+0%
73
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Dota 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 70
+0%
70
+0%
Elden Ring 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
World of Tanks 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+0%
120
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1
+0%
1
+0%
Dota 2 74
+0%
74
+0%
Elden Ring 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+0%
74
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+0%
74
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 13
+0%
13
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+0%
64
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how GeForce G102M and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 11700% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.43 34.87
Recency 8 January 2009 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 120 Watt

GeForce G102M has 757.1% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has a 8009.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G102M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GeForce G102M
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 41 vote

Rate GeForce G102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 75 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.