Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce G102M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G102M with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

GeForce G102M
2009
Up to 512 MB GDDR2, 14 Watt
0.41
RX 5700 XT
2019, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
38.81
+9366%

5700 XT outperforms G102M by a whopping 9366% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1338137
Place by popularitynot in top-10036
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data34.08
Power efficiency2.2513.25
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameC79Navi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)7 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed450 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1905 MHz
Number of transistors314 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600304.8
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
Gigaflops48no data
ROPs464
TMUs8160
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 1.0no data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data272 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsVGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce G102M 0.41
RX 5700 XT 38.81
+9366%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce G102M 169
Samples: 103
RX 5700 XT 16062
+9404%
Samples: 17805

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−12400%
125
+12400%
1440p0−176
4K-0−147

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.19
1440pno data5.25
4Kno data8.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 347
+0%
347
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 145
+0%
145
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 308
+0%
308
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Far Cry 5 138
+0%
138
+0%
Fortnite 223
+0%
223
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 155
+0%
155
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 177
+0%
177
+0%
Valorant 313
+0%
313
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 177
+0%
177
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+0%
75
+0%
Dota 2 92
+0%
92
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Fortnite 179
+0%
179
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 154
+0%
154
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 152
+0%
152
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+0%
97
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 166
+0%
166
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+0%
154
+0%
Valorant 294
+0%
294
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+0%
67
+0%
Dota 2 103
+0%
103
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 148
+0%
148
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139
+0%
139
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93
+0%
93
+0%
Valorant 159
+0%
159
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 143
+0%
143
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 105
+0%
105
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 286
+0%
286
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 119
+0%
119
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 79
+0%
79
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 242
+0%
242
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53
+0%
53
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45
+0%
45
+0%

This is how GeForce G102M and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 12400% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 38.81
Recency 8 January 2009 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 225 Watt

GeForce G102M has 1507% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 9366% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G102M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce G102M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 50 votes

Rate GeForce G102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10294 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G102M or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.