GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs G102M

Place in the ranking	1253	89
Place by popularity	not in top-100	15
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	46.45
Power efficiency	2.11	16.90
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	C79	TU106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	8 January 2009 (16 years ago)	9 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	2176
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1470 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1650 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	3.600	224.4
Floating-point processing power	0.0352 TFLOPS	7.181 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	48	no data
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	8	136
Tensor Cores	no data	272
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 1.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 512 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	400 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management	8.0	no data
VR Ready	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce G102M 0.43

RTX 2060 Super 42.95
+9888%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce G102M 167

RTX 2060 Super 16508
+9785%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −11700%	118 +11700%
1440p	0−1	67
4K	-0−1	43

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.38
1440p	no data	5.96
4K	no data	9.28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	91 +0%	91 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	88 +0%	88 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90 +0%	90 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	73 +0%	73 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	77 +0%	77 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	228 +0%	228 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	123 +0%	123 +0%
Metro Exodus	127 +0%	127 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 +0%	122 +0%
Valorant	202 +0%	202 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	156 +0%	156 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	64 +0%	64 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 +0%	67 +0%
Dota 2	159 +0%	159 +0%
Far Cry 5	122 +0%	122 +0%
Fortnite	149 +0%	149 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	184 +0%	184 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	90 +0%	90 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	139 +0%	139 +0%
Metro Exodus	91 +0%	91 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	241 +0%	241 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	59 +0%	59 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Valorant	105 +0%	105 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	82 +0%	82 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	59 +0%	59 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	58 +0%	58 +0%
Dota 2	185 +0%	185 +0%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	156 +0%	156 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	92 +0%	92 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	127 +0%	127 +0%
Valorant	180 +0%	180 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	86 +0%	86 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	86 +0%	86 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	38 +0%	38 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 +0%	74 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	39 +0%	39 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	38 +0%	38 +0%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	114 +0%	114 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	59 +0%	59 +0%
Metro Exodus	87 +0%	87 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Valorant	114 +0%	114 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	23 +0%	23 +0%
Dota 2	83 +0%	83 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	83 +0%	83 +0%
Metro Exodus	31 +0%	31 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	138 +0%	138 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +0%	24 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	83 +0%	83 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42 +0%	42 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +0%	18 +0%
Dota 2	121 +0%	121 +0%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Fortnite	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	65 +0%	65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	33 +0%	33 +0%
Valorant	59 +0%	59 +0%

This is how GeForce G102M and RTX 2060 Super compete in popular games:

RTX 2060 Super is 11700% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.43	42.95
Recency	8 January 2009	9 July 2019
Chip lithography	65 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	175 Watt

GeForce G102M has 1150% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Super, on the other hand, has a 9888.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G102M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce G102M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 Super is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.