Radeon RX 8050S vs GeForce G 105M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce G 105M and Radeon RX 8050S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
8050S outperforms G 105M by a whopping 16227% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1445 | 155 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.21 | no data |
| Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | no data |
| GPU code name | N10M-GE1 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 (17 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 640 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2800 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 0−1 | 94 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8300%
|
80−85
+8300%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8300%
|
80−85
+8300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−1971%
|
140−150
+1971%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−764%
|
210−220
+764%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−2217%
|
270−280
+2217%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8300%
|
80−85
+8300%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−16011%
|
1450−1500
+16011%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−1971%
|
140−150
+1971%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−3020%
|
156
+3020%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−764%
|
210−220
+764%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−8300%
|
80−85
+8300%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−16011%
|
1450−1500
+16011%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−4567%
|
140−150
+4567%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−1971%
|
140−150
+1971%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1740%
|
92
+1740%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−16100%
|
4050−4100
+16100%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−2867%
|
85−90
+2867%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−14900%
|
300−310
+14900%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−10100%
|
100−110
+10100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−6600%
|
65−70
+6600%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−457%
|
75−80
+457%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−22100%
|
220−230
+22100%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−4600%
|
45−50
+4600%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−2200%
|
45−50
+2200%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100
+0%
|
100
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 96
+0%
|
96
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 118
+0%
|
118
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 85
+0%
|
85
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 250−260
+0%
|
250−260
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Valorant | 240−250
+0%
|
240−250
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 8050S is 22100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 8050S performs better in 22 tests (41%)
- there's a draw in 32 tests (59%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
