ATI Radeon Xpress 200M vs GeForce G 103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G 103M and Radeon Xpress 200M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

G 103M
2009
512 MB DDR2
0.15
+200%

G 103M outperforms 200M by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14891545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameG98RC410
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)2005 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores86
Core clock speed640 MHz336 MHz
Boost clock speedno data350 MHz
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.67
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.09.0 (9_0)
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

G 103M 0.15
+200%
ATI Xpress 200M 0.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

G 103M 62
+182%
Samples: 117
ATI Xpress 200M 22
Samples: 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the G 103M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • G 103M performs better in 9 tests (36%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (64%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 0.05
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm

G 103M has a 200% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce G 103M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 200M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G 103M
GeForce G 103M
ATI Radeon Xpress 200M
Radeon Xpress 200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate GeForce G 103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 47 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 103M or Radeon Xpress 200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.