ATI Radeon E4690 vs GeForce G 103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G 103M with Radeon E4690, including specs and performance data.

G 103M
2009
512 MB DDR2
0.15

E4690 outperforms G 103M by a whopping 547% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14911166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.49
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG98RV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)1 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8320
Core clock speed640 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data514 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data19.20
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-II
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.010.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.0

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

G 103M 0.15
ATI E4690 0.97
+547%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

G 103M 62
Samples: 117
ATI E4690 405
+553%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Valorant 24−27
−525%
150−160
+525%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−525%
150−160
+525%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 24−27
−525%
150−160
+525%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Valorant 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 0.97
Recency 1 September 2009 1 June 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm

G 103M has an age advantage of 3 months.

ATI E4690, on the other hand, has a 546.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon E4690 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G 103M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce G 103M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon E4690 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G 103M
GeForce G 103M
ATI Radeon E4690
Radeon E4690

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate GeForce G 103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 103M or Radeon E4690, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.