Radeon 625 vs GeForce G 103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9200M GS 9200M GS GDDR3 9300M GS 9300M GS DDR2 9300M GS GDDR3 G 103M G103M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
610 610M 620 625 630 660M 680M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G 103M and Radeon 625, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

G 103M
2009
512 MB DDR2
0.15

625 outperforms G 103M by a whopping 1613% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
G 103M G 103M
Radeon 625 Radeon 625

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1491868
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.96
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameG98Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)13 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8384
Core clock speed640 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1024 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.58
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

G 103M 0.15
Radeon 625 2.57
+1613%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

G 103M 62
Samples: 117
Radeon 625 1067
+1621%
Samples: 58

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 5−6

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Valorant 24−27
−83.3%
40−45
+83.3%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−355%
50−55
+355%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 5−6
Dota 2 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 24−27
−83.3%
40−45
+83.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 5−6
Dota 2 8−9
−225%
24−27
+225%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−333%
12−14
+333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Valorant 24−27
−83.3%
40−45
+83.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Valorant 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 625 is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Radeon 625 performs better in 22 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 25 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.15 2.57
Recency 1 September 2009 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

Radeon 625 has a 1613% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon 625 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G 103M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
Go 6600 GeForce Go 6600
Radeon 625 Radeon 625
vs
GTX 760A GeForce GTX 760A
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
Go 7300 GeForce Go 7300
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
ATI 9000 Radeon 9000
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mac Edition Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
ATI Rage Mobility-M Mobility M
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
ATI Rage Mobility-M1 Mobility M1
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
FirePro S9010 FirePro S9010
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
RTX 8200 RTX 8200
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
HD 8400 Mobile IGP HD 8400 Mobile IGP
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
G 103M GeForce G 103M
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Plus Graphics G4 48EU Mobile
9500M GE GeForce 9500M GE
vs
GeForce 610 GeForce 610

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 36 votes

Rate GeForce G 103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 166 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 103M or Radeon 625, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.