L40 vs GeForce G 103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce G 103M with L40, including specs and performance data.

G 103M
2009
512 MB DDR2
0.15

L40 outperforms G 103M by a whopping 35713% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking149162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.79
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG98AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)13 October 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores818176
Core clock speed640 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2490 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,414
Floating-point processing powerno data90.52 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142
L1 Cacheno data17.8 MB
L2 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

G 103M 0.15
L40 53.72
+35713%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

G 103M 62
Samples: 117
L40 22466
+36135%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−34900%
1050−1100
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−35614%
2500−2550
+35614%
Valorant 24−27
−35525%
8550−8600
+35525%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−35355%
3900−3950
+35355%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−35525%
2850−2900
+35525%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−34900%
1050−1100
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−35614%
2500−2550
+35614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−34900%
1750−1800
+34900%
Valorant 24−27
−35525%
8550−8600
+35525%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 8−9
−35525%
2850−2900
+35525%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−34900%
1050−1100
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−35614%
2500−2550
+35614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−34900%
1750−1800
+34900%
Valorant 24−27
−35525%
8550−8600
+35525%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−34900%
1050−1100
+34900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−34900%
700−750
+34900%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−35614%
5000−5050
+35614%
Valorant 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−34900%
350−400
+34900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−34900%
700−750
+34900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 53.72
Recency 1 September 2009 13 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm

L40 has a 35713.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

The L40 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G 103M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce G 103M is a notebook graphics card while L40 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G 103M
GeForce G 103M
NVIDIA L40
L40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 36 votes

Rate GeForce G 103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 32 votes

Rate L40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G 103M or L40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.