GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs G 103M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce G 103M and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms G 103M by a whopping 15644% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1421 | 219 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 28.95 |
Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | Ampere (2020−2024) |
GPU code name | G98 | GN20-P0-R 6 GB |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 6 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 8 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 640 MHz | 1237 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1492 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 8 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP) |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | no data | large |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 96 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Shared memory | - | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 10.0 | 12_2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | -0−1 | 69 |
1440p | -0−1 | 37 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−422%
|
45−50
+422%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−3950%
|
81
+3950%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−422%
|
45−50
+422%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1500%
|
32
+1500%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−2000%
|
105
+2000%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−344%
|
40
+344%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1050%
|
23
+1050%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−1517%
|
97
+1517%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1620%
|
86
+1620%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−3060%
|
150−160
+3060%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−1950%
|
80−85
+1950%
|
World of Tanks | 10−11
−2490%
|
250−260
+2490%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
−422%
|
45−50
+422%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−850%
|
19
+850%
|
Far Cry 5 | 6−7
−1183%
|
75−80
+1183%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1420%
|
76
+1420%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−3060%
|
150−160
+3060%
|
1440p
High Preset
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−17400%
|
170−180
+17400%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 21−24 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−600%
|
21−24
+600%
|
Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−1750%
|
70−75
+1750%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−825%
|
37
+825%
|
Valorant | 4−5
−1600%
|
65−70
+1600%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−186%
|
20−22
+186%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
−193%
|
40−45
+193%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−193%
|
40−45
+193%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 75−80 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
−193%
|
40−45
+193%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 24−27 |
Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−186%
|
20−22
+186%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
Dota 2 | 14−16
−193%
|
40−45
+193%
|
Valorant | 0−1 | 30−35 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 61
+0%
|
61
+0%
|
Fortnite | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 91
+0%
|
91
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 40
+0%
|
40
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
World of Tanks | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 57
+0%
|
57
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Metro Exodus | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Fortnite | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 17400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 31 test (52%)
- there's a draw in 29 tests (48%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.16 | 25.19 |
Recency | 1 September 2009 | 6 January 2023 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 8 nm |
RTX 3050 6GB Mobile has a 15643.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G 103M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.