Quadro Plex 2200 S4 vs GeForce FX Go5650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1543not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV31GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2003 (22 years ago)25 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240 ×4
Core clock speed325 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistors80 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rate1.30051.84 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPs432 ×4
TMUs480 ×4
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data522 mm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed295 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.44 GB/s102.4 GB/s ×4

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)3.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 25 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 55 nm

Plex 2200 S4 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go5650 and Quadro Plex 2200 S4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go5650 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro Plex 2200 S4 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5650
GeForce FX Go5650
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
Quadro Plex 2200 S4

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce FX Go5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro Plex 2200 S4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX Go5650 or Quadro Plex 2200 S4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.