P106-090 vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce FX 5950 Ultra with P106-090, including specs and performance data.

FX 5950 Ultra
2003, $499
256 MB DDR, 74 Watt
0.14

P106-090 outperforms 5950 Ultra by a whopping 4343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1489623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.156.37
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV38GP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 October 2003 (22 years ago)31 July 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed475 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1531 MHz
Number of transistors135 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate3.80073.49
Floating-point processing powerno data2.352 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs848
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x1
Length229 mm250 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed475 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth30.4 GB/s192.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 5950 Ultra 0.14
P106-090 6.22
+4343%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5950 Ultra 59
Samples: 3
P106-090 2603
+4312%
Samples: 16

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.14 6.22
Recency 23 October 2003 31 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 75 Watt

FX 5950 Ultra has 1.4% lower power consumption.

P106-090, on the other hand, has a 4342.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5950 Ultra in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while P106-090 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 80 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 65 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5950 Ultra or P106-090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.