RTX PRO 6000 vs GeForce FX 5900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce FX 5900 with RTX PRO 6000, including specs and performance data.

FX 5900
2003, $399
128 MB DDR
0.08

RTX PRO 6000 outperforms FX 5900 by a whopping 8113% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1532613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.84
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNV35GB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 May 2003 (22 years ago)2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data24064
Core clock speed400 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors135 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2001,810
Floating-point processing powerno data115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs8752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cacheno data23.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 5.0 x16
Length218 mm304 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount128 MB96 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 5900 0.08
RTX PRO 6000 6.57
+8113%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5900 34
Samples: 8
RTX PRO 6000 2747
+7979%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 6.57
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 96 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 6000 has a 8112.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 76700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5900 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5900 is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
GeForce FX 5900
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 55 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 78 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5900 or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.