GeForce 9100M G mGPU vs FX 5700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1512not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.31no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNV36C77
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 October 2003 (22 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed425 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors82 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate1.7001.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)3.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 130 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 12 Watt

9100M G mGPU has an age advantage of 4 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 and GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5700 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
GeForce FX 5700
NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD
GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5700 or GeForce 9100M G mGPU AMD, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.