GeForce FX 5700 vs 9200M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9200M GS with GeForce FX 5700, including specs and performance data.

9200M GS
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 13 Watt
0.31
+210%

9200M GS outperforms FX 5700 by a whopping 210% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13781514
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.830.31
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG98NV36
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)23 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed550 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors210 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate4.4001.700
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s16 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9200M GS 0.31
+210%
FX 5700 0.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9200M GS 129
+223%
Samples: 199
FX 5700 40
Samples: 24

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Valorant 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Valorant 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Valorant 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 0.10
Recency 3 June 2008 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 25 Watt

9200M GS has a 210% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9200M GS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9200M GS
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
GeForce FX 5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 74 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M GS or GeForce FX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.